Cervical Cancer Vaccine Wiki

Last Updated on Tuesday, 13 September 2011 11:28 Written by Natural Health Team Tuesday, 13 September 2011 11:28

Health Information about Cervical Cancer Vaccine Wiki

Little do these women know that the vaccine they are about to put into their bodies is still in Phase 4 testing, contains known carcinogenic ingredients, and has many hidden dangers. Cervical Cancer Vaccine Wiki As the pharmaceutical industry brings in billions of dollars and tries to avoid the negative publicity surrounding Gardasil (the human papillomavirus vaccine), women are being put at risk. It is important for all women to know what the human papillomavirus (HPV) is, what the virus does, what the vaccine is known to do and what the side effects and dangers are of the vaccine in order to make informed and potentially life-saving choices.

The human papillomavirus can be found in over 100 strains and is a viral infection which can cause varied symptoms, ranging from warts to infections of the body’s mucus membranes. The virus we will explore is the type that causes an infection of the body’s mucus membranes. This virus often has no visible symptoms but creates small, painless lesions throughout the interior genital areas. These lesions create abnormal cells which are found to be the most common type of cell to place an individual at risk for cancer. However, as the U.S. National Cancer Institute reported about the link between the human papillomavirus and cancer, “direct causation has not been proven. In a controlled study of age-matched women, 67% of those with cervical cancer and 43% of those without were found to be HPV-positive” (1). So, although an individual may have HPV, there is no degree of certainty that cervical cancer will result. It is vital to understand that although one can be vaccinated for HPV, the need for a routine annual pap smear is just as strong as it is for those without the vaccine, and early detection of any abnormal cells will remain the key to staying cancer free.

The diagnosis of HPV is very easy, and HPV is treatable once detected. It’s important that sexually active females have a pap smear annually to help identify HPV (and other viruses) in their systems as soon as possible so that treatment for HPV can be preformed with little or no adverse reactions. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention produced a report to congress titled “Prevention of Genital Human Papillomavirus Infection” in which it was stated that “regular cervical cancer screening for all sexually active women and treatment for precancerous lesions remains the key strategy to prevent cervical cancer” (5). It is important to realize that although one can be vaccinated, routine testing for HPV should continue regardless as HPV is not the only cause of cervical cancer.

On June 8, 2006, a vaccination for HPV was licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Since that date, 17 individuals have died from the vaccine; that equals approximately one individual per month that the vaccine has been on the market. One individual who died as a result of the HPV vaccine was a girl of 12 years of age who was encouraged by her school nurse to get vaccinated, another was a woman who was just 19 years old. Both seemingly healthy individuals died from heart complications caused by the HPV vaccination and had no prior history of medical complications. Although this data is readily available to the public online, few individuals make informed decisions about vaccines, and even fewer individuals take the time to read the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

The VAERS is an online database which tracks all adverse reactions reported from vaccines which are currently on the market. To date, there are 3,461 adverse reaction reports on file with the FDA for Gardasil. This number makes up over 50% of all adverse reaction reports filed in 2006 and 2007 combined. The FDA is being flooded by reports of problems experienced from Gardasil and has allowed the product to stay on the market with close monitoring and tight restrictions. Some of those restrictions include: that the vaccine only be given to individuals between the ages of 9 to 26, individuals who already have contracted HPV should not be given the vaccine, and pregnant women should not be given the vaccine (“Merck’s Gardasil Vaccine” 20). Although most drugs have some restrictions the concern rises with the number of restrictions associated with this vaccine and the vastness of the types of restrictions.

]]>

Lung Cancer Secrets Revealed Click here

Prior to the FDA’s acceptance of this vaccine it had been tested on only 11,000 individuals (of which less than 1,000 were girls under the age of 20). This testing population raises the question of what a sample group should include. Is it safe to say that because 1,000 participants between 9 and 20 were tested that this vaccine is safe for all women between 9 and 20? Although a standard for testing population does not currently exist, it is safe to assume that Merck’s sample population be too small to be of accurate proportion. Additionally, testing of this drug was conducted by a private corporation paid for by the drug’s manufacturer, and the FDA did not do an audit of the findings to ensure their accuracy. In fact, the FDA never does audits on drug findings and always trusts the manufacturer. Is this a safe practice?

Individuals who participated in the experimentation of this drug were monitored for, on average, 18 months following vaccination (United States Food and Drug Administration Clinical Review of Biological License Application). This means that long term effects of the drug can not be determined since individuals were only watched for less than two years time. However, the long term effects are almost moot when you take into account that the short term effectiveness of the drug may not be known either. As Anastacia Austin, a reporter for Buzzle reported in review of the Gardasil trial reports:

Nobody in the study, control or placebo group, contracted the cancer. This is because its incubation period is 15-20 years; most women who have it (average age: 47) contracted the virus which caused it in their thirties. The longest test trial was less than four years. The vaccine’s makers state that the effectiveness of this vaccine is five years, maximum (1).

Being that no one in the study contracted cervical cancer and the drug’s effectiveness is limited to five years (although the study was only completed for 18 months), how is it that we can say with any degree of certainty that this vaccine works? We can’t. It appears that Merck is marketing a drug to a population that doesn’t need it, and the testing of the drug cannot be found to hold any degree of effectiveness since individuals within the entire sample population (those who received the vaccine and those that didn’t) never contracted cervical cancer.

Since the sample population of 11,000 women included individuals who never contracted cervical cancer, is it safe to say that only a small portion of women will contract this form of cancer? The CDC reports that “less than 1% of all female cancer cases and deaths in the US” are from cervical cancer (Lobato 4). This number raises the immediate question of why there seems to be a need for the vaccine if so few individuals contract this form of cancer. In “The epidemiology of the human papillomavirus infections” published in a recent scientific journal, genital HPV infections are reported as “very common, with estimates suggesting that more than 50% of women will become infected with one or more of the sexually transmitted HPV types at some time in adulthood” (16). So, although the vast majority of women contract HPV, there seems to be a very slim margin that actually results in cervical cancer.

Helen Lobato, a renown medical reporter focused on the advocacy of patient rights, reported that “only one percent of women develop cervical cancer…mortality rates [from cervical cancer] generally increase with age with the highest number of deaths occurring in the 75-79 age group” (1). Being that cervical cancer is more prominent in women of this age group, it would require that Gardasil stay effective and efficient in the body for 53 years. However, Gardasil’s trials were only tested on the product’s effectiveness for 18 months, there is no way of telling if the drug will be effective at the time in a woman’s life when it will be most needed, again defeating the purpose of the vaccine.

Another major concern associated with the testing and trials of Gardasil is the methodology used in the placebo practice. The National Vaccine Information Center noted in reviewing the Merck trials that “the FDA allowed Merck to use a potentially reactive aluminum containing placebo as a control for…trial participants, rather than a non-reactive saline solution placebo” (1). This is a key factor in the findings associated with the testing of Gardasil. The use of an aluminum containing placebo has been known to artificially inflate the number of adverse reactions in the placebo group (Merck’s Gardasil Vaccine Not Proven Safe for Little Girls). If the number of adverse reactions in the placebo group is abnormally high, it makes the trial group reactions appear lower and allows for a misrepresentation of the vaccines safety.

Gardasil itself “contains 225mcg of aluminum ” (Gardasil Product Label 1). Reported in “Effects of Aluminum on the Neurotoxicty of Primary Cultured Neurons and on the Aggregation of Betamyloid Protein,” a study on the effects of aluminum, “animal and human studies have shown that aluminum can cause nerve cell death” (1). This information is only vital if it pertains to Gardasil. Does it? Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) has been found to make up approximately 5% of the reported adverse reactions to Gardasil. GBS is “a neurological illness resulting in muscle weakness and sometimes in paralysis” (HPV Vaccine 2). GBS can be linked to an excess of metal in the blood supply and therefore can be found to be in correlations with Merck’s use of aluminum in Gardasil (Kawahara 211-217). “Shannon Nelson, an 18 year old athlete…got the HPV shot…within a week, she developed Guillian-Barre Syndrome (GBS)…in Nelson’s case, she developed paralysis that lasted for over two months” (Worries Remain 1). Other illnesses associated with metal toxicity in the body include Bell’s Palsy and seizures.

The question arises, why would the FDA authorize this vaccine with all these known flaws? The fact is that they haven’t provided this vaccine with full authorization. In fact, the licensure provided for Gardasil is a trial license which includes the FDA note to the manufacturer which requires Merck to “conduct several additional studies…including studies to further evaluate general safety and long-term effects” of the drug (2). The FDA is well aware that Merck’s trials so far have not proven effectiveness and the general safety is still in question; however, the FDA would like to see a larger population tested, so the general public is used for experimentation.

The FDA has another grave concern to consider with this drug and asked that “the manufacturer…monitor pregnancy outcomes of women who received Gardasil while unknowingly pregnant” (Food and Drug Administration 2). While available to the public, 77 women who were unknowingly pregnant received Gardasil. Judicial Watch, a Washington D.C. based consumer advocacy group, reported that “Of the 77 women who received the vaccine while pregnant, 33 experienced side effects ranging from spontaneous abortions to fetal abnormalities” (1). That means that 43% of women who received Gardasil while pregnant had major complications. This percentage is extremely high and because of this correlation, it should be recommended that all sexually active individuals looking to get Gardasil be first tested for pregnancy (but it’s not). This raises the question of what happens in ten years when the women who are receiving Gardasil now decide to have children. There is only speculation available at this time as to whether babies from Gardasil recipients will be healthy or have abnormalities, since Gardasil’s long term effects have not been reviewed to date.

Having the knowledge to make an informed decision about the products put into your body is the key to remaining safe in an environment that doesn’t always have the consumer’s best interest at hand. Before rushing to the doctor to receive the latest and greatest in drug technology, take the time to research the product, read the label and review the findings. Just because the product is being offered to you, doesn’t mean that testing is complete. Being an informed consumer is the only way to avoid being a guinea pig.

lung cancer treatment breakthroughs Click here

CME: Minimally Invasive Surgery in Uterine/Cervical Cancer (Module 2) Breast cancer remains the most frequently diagnosed solid tumor and second leading cause of cancer death in US women. If these rates continue, a female child born today will have about a 1 in 8 chance of developing breast cancer at some point during her life. Greater public awareness of signs and symptoms have increased early diagnosis, breast cancer treatment is still dependent on clinical factors such as stage, histology, HER-2 and hormonal status. It is estimated that 20 million Americans may have the human papillomavirus (HPV). Yet more than 76 percent of US women have never heard of this sexually transmitted virus which causes nearly all cervical cancers. Women who are not diagnosed with cervical cancer through screening typically present with advanced disease. In 2010, the NCI placed the number of newly diagnosed cases of cervical cancer at 12000 with related deaths at 4000. The scientists and clinicians at City of Hope have a long history of developing and advancing new techniques to screen for, diagnose and treat gynecologic and breast cancers. With the goal of contributing to the improvement of quality of life and overall outcomes for these patient populations, these activity has been designed by these experts, representing multiple disciplines, to profile and discuss the current advances and future directions in the treatment of gynecologic and breast cancers, and to engage with the learner in …

Find More Health Care Articles

Cervical Cancer Vaccine Risks

Last Updated on Saturday, 10 September 2011 07:29 Written by Natural Health Team Saturday, 10 September 2011 07:29

Health Information about Cervical Cancer Vaccine Risks

A large percentage of women admit to living in fear of the big C, however cervical or breast cancer free women admit that the thought of contacting the disease never leaves their thoughts.

Cervical Cancer Vaccine Risks

Sadly, self breast examination seems to be unimportant for some women who choose to ignore a health issue as vital to secure their well being, ignoring any indication that breast cancer is developing can result in the patient having to fight for their life. If an examination of the breasts had taken place in some unfortunate cases the whole scenario would have just involved treating the breast cancer and no involvement of an undertaker. Women need to wise up because if they continue to carry ignorance as an ally to help beat this battle – then they lose. Winning includes modern medicines. Early cancer treatment betters survival odds hence giving a patient the chance to carry on with their life instead of throwing it away.

Aside from bosom blunders where ignorance may have prevailed we have cervical cancer. Women need to be aware of all involvements i.e. what to expect throughout any cervical cancer treatments. The cervix is the lower part of the womb or uterus and is commonly referred to as the ‘neck of the womb’.

The cervix and its purpose are to help maintain a normal pregnancy. In non-pregnant women, the cervix has no obvious function. In the UK cervical cancer is down on paper as the sixth most common cancer in women. It is of the utmost importance for a woman to keep healthy in mind body and soul by having regular cervical cancer smear tests – oft times referred to as a Pap smear test. Smear tests are commonly carried out in order to detect any cell changes that come before cancer. It’s a waiting game, meaning, it can take years for these cell changes detected at the time of a cervical smear test to become cancer. Luckily some changes have been known to go away by themselves.

]]>

Lung Cancer Secrets Revealed Click here

Women who waited in anticipation for their cancer results said they found it more of an ordeal coping with the wait than that of receiving the actual prognosis (cervical cancer).

Suffering in silence is not healthy, not all abnormal test results indicate that cervical cancer is present. It is through early diagnosis and treatment of pre-cancerous changes that development of actual cancer can be prevented. Early detection is most profound to help fight the disease.

There are two types of this cancer; the squamous cell cancer and aden-ocarcinoma. Cervical smear tests detect the early changes of squamous cell cancer. Early stage growths of certain cancers can be treated with surgery or radiotherapy thus resulting in a cure.

Regular questions asked about cervical cancer are what the causes are; well there is no definite single cause, however study points the finger at a viral infection of the cervix or cancer sticks (cigarettes). Fags are a major health hazard relating to lung cancer, smoking is said to also increase the risk of developing cervical cancer and even the number of partners in youth trial runs of intercourse have also been linked to being connected to the cause. In the UK cervical tests are routinely performed every three years, lives are being saved because of this.

Females face a silent but deadly situation because; pre-cancerous changes of the cervix that show up on cervical smear tests unfortunately do not give symptoms. Undergoing a biopsy of the cervix is the way cervical cancer is diagnosed. The process is normally done with an internal examination called a colposcopy.

Treating cancer of the cervix will purely depend upon the severity of the disuse, meaning, has it spread to the pelvis. A radical hysterectomy or Wertheim’s hysterectomy may be suggested as treatment. It is at this stage that a specialist gynaecologist will conduct surgery. Radiotherapy destroys tumour cells that the gynaecologist cannot see.

Remember “out of sight out of mind”, is not a healthy approach for a cure; a healthy approach is to keep it in mind and any cervical cancer symptoms must be kept in sight.

lung cancer treatment breakthroughs Click here

Find More Health Care Articles

Side Effects Of Cervical Cancer Vaccine

Last Updated on Sunday, 4 September 2011 11:28 Written by Natural Health Team Sunday, 4 September 2011 11:28

Health Information about Side Effects Of Cervical Cancer Vaccine

I am a pharmacist and get this question quite a bit.

Side Effects Of Cervical Cancer Vaccine

So here is the scoop…   It was really made to be the cervical cancer vaccine because 99% of cervical cancer is linked to HPV.    The human papillomavirus (HPV) is a virus that has a lot of different strains (i.e. HPV-1, HPV-2, etc.). Some HPV strains cause common warts on feet, hands, etc.   Then there are sexually transmitted HPV strains that cause genital and anal warts. Other STD HPV strains have been linked to different cancers (penile, rectal). Then even other STD HPV strains (there are a bunch!) have been linked to cancer of the cervix (these are called strains).  

As I mentioned before, studies show that 99% of women with cervical cancer also have HPV.   However, not everyone with high risk HPV will get cervical cancer. Most cases of HPV (all strains) are cleared naturally by the body within 2 years.   

Sometimes the will stick around longer -for these women their risk for cervical cancer goes up.   However, they still may not get cervical cancer because high risk HPV plus some other things (which have not been figured out yet) together cause cervical cancer.    

It is like an equation: .  

So, the idea is if we can vaccinate for high risk HPV -we can take the HPV out of the equation and hopefully decrease the risk of getting cancer of the cervix.     In the States we now have -the HPV vaccine that covers:

1.     Two high risk HPV strains that are responsible for 70% of all cervical cancer cases and   

2.     Two HPV strains that cause 90% of genital wart cases.  

Lung Cancer Secrets Revealed Click here

The vaccine is relatively new -it was released in the States in 2006. Currently it is approved girls and women 9 to 26 years old and is given at a 3 shot series (given at 0, 2 month and 6 months).   Even with the vaccine, there is a risk to get high risk HPV because 1) it does not necessarily protect 100% and 2) it does not cover 30% of the strains of high risk HPV that can lead to cancer of the cervix.  

]]>

Common side effects include pain and swelling at injection site, headache, fever, fainting. More serious side effects include seizures, Guillain-Barre syndrome, severe allergic reaction and 17 deaths (although they were ruled as not related).  

So…  Well, for now the studies show that it works very well to prevent genital warts and abnormal pap smears. But because it is so new, there are a few issues to be worked out…

1.     Studies show that the 3 part vaccine will protect for at least 5 years -it is not known yet if the girls/women will need a booster shot later

2.     It is assumed that because the vaccine decreased abnormal pap smears that it will lessen cases of cervical cancer too -however because cancer of the cervix usually takes at least 10 years to show up after being infected with high risk HPV and it is still relatively early in the test girls/women, it is not yet proven.    

I know this stuff can be confusing so please contact me, your local pharmacist or physician.  

I am a pharmacist. I currently work at a retail pharmacy.

I am a pharmacist and get this question quite a bit.

So here is the scoop…   It was really made to be the cervical cancer vaccine because 99% of cervical cancer is linked to HPV.    The human papillomavirus (HPV) is a virus that has a lot of different strains (i.e. HPV-1, HPV-2, etc.). Some HPV strains cause common warts on feet, hands, etc.   Then there are sexually transmitted HPV strains that cause genital and anal warts. Other STD HPV strains have been linked to different cancers (penile, rectal). Then even other STD HPV strains (there are a bunch!) have been linked to cancer of the cervix (these are called strains).  

As I mentioned before, studies show that 99% of women with cervical cancer also have HPV.   However, not everyone with high risk HPV will get cervical cancer. Most cases of HPV (all strains) are cleared naturally by the body within 2 years.   

Sometimes the will stick around longer -for these women their risk for cervical cancer goes up.   However, they still may not get cervical cancer because high risk HPV plus some other things (which have not been figured out yet) together cause cervical cancer.    

It is like an equation: .  

So, the idea is if we can vaccinate for high risk HPV -we can take the HPV out of the equation and hopefully decrease the risk of getting cancer of the cervix.     In the States we now have -the HPV vaccine that covers:

1.     Two high risk HPV strains that are responsible for 70% of all cervical cancer cases and   

2.     Two HPV strains that cause 90% of genital wart cases.  

The vaccine is relatively new -it was released in the States in 2006. Currently it is approved girls and women 9 to 26 years old and is given at a 3 shot series (given at 0, 2 month and 6 months).   Even with the vaccine, there is a risk to get high risk HPV because 1) it does not necessarily protect 100% and 2) it does not cover 30% of the strains of high risk HPV that can lead to cancer of the cervix.  

Common side effects include pain and swelling at injection site, headache, fever, fainting. More serious side effects include seizures, Guillain-Barre syndrome, severe allergic reaction and 17 deaths (although they were ruled as not related).  

So…  Well, for now the studies show that it works very well to prevent genital warts and abnormal pap smears. But because it is so new, there are a few issues to be worked out…

1.     Studies show that the 3 part vaccine will protect for at least 5 years -it is not known yet if the girls/women will need a booster shot later

2.     It is assumed that because the vaccine decreased abnormal pap smears that it will lessen cases of cervical cancer too -however because cancer of the cervix usually takes at least 10 years to show up after being infected with high risk HPV and it is still relatively early in the test girls/women, it is not yet proven.    

I know this stuff can be confusing so please contact me, your local pharmacist or physician.  

I am a pharmacist. I currently work at a retail pharmacy.

lung cancer treatment breakthroughs Click here

Find More Health Care Articles

Cervical Cancer Vaccine Controversy

Last Updated on Tuesday, 30 August 2011 03:28 Written by Natural Health Team Tuesday, 30 August 2011 03:28

Health Information about Cervical Cancer Vaccine Controversy

The most common victims of cervical cancer are older woman (i.e. 40+). Cervical Cancer Vaccine Controversy Cervical cancer is generally caused by HPV (human papilloma virus) which gets transmitted through sexual contact and over a period of time (which can last for years) leads to cancerous cervix cells.

Prevention against cervical cancer

Since HPV gets sexually transmitted, having multiple sex partners can increase the chances of occurrence of cervical cancer. The anti-bodies produced by our body are the best guard against HPV and anything that causes our immune system to weaken can also aid in development of cervical cancer. In that sense, taking good care of your health too is a preventive measure for cervical cancer.

Symptoms of cervical cancer

The most common symptoms of cervical cancer include pelvic pain or pain during intercourse, unexpected vaginal discharge or bleeding, increase in the frequency of urination etc. However, the occurrence of these symptoms doesn’t necessarily imply cervical cancer. These symptoms just suggest that cervical cancer could be a possibility and hence point to the need of undergoing other cervical cancer tests

]]>

Detecting cervical cancer

Lung Cancer Secrets Revealed Click here

One of the best ways of detecting cervical cancer is to undergo routine/ regular cervical cancer screening tests. The cervical cancer screening test (i.e. the pap test or the pap smear test) is one of the best ways of catching cervical cancer in early stages. This test is not at all painful and just involves brushing off of cells from your cervix for microscopic examination. The pap test results are generally given as a rating on a scale of 1 to 5 where in 1 indicates normal cervix cells and 5 indicates serious cancer signs. Though medical research is constantly trying to create new and better ways of detecting cervical cancer, Pap tests are the best technique that we have available today for early detection of cervical cancer. However, pap tests are not always accurate and if other symptoms strongly suggest cervical cancer, a second round of cervical tests might be recommended by the doctor.

Treatment of cervical cancer

The treatment of cervical cancer is effective mostly when the cervical cancer is detected while it is still in its early stages. The treatment involves surgical procedures (including removal of uterus, fallopian tubes and ovaries), chemotherapy and radiation. The earlier you are able to detect cervical cancer, the better are your chances of cure. In fact, pap tests can even detect pre-cancerous stage and hence make the treatment of cervical cancer even more effective.

lung cancer treatment breakthroughs Click here

www.nucleusinc.com This 3D medical animation begins with a detailed explanation of the criteria doctors use to stage cervical cancer. Staging refers to the extent of the spread of the disease. Stage 0, Stage IA, Stage IIA, Stage IIIA, Stage IVA, Stage IB, Stage IIB, Stage IIIV, Stage IVAB are each shown in detail.
Video Rating: 5 / 5

Find More Health Care Articles

Cervical Cancer Surgery In India To Cure Cervical Cancer

Last Updated on Sunday, 1 August 2010 07:48 Written by Natural Health Team Wednesday, 9 September 2009 02:42

Cervical cancer surgery in India can assist in curing cancer tumors in the cervix portion. Cancer tumors are of various types cervical cancer tumors is also one of them. Cervical cancer surgery in . . .
Read The Full Story