Comments on: Mccain: Don’t Give Me That

By: eljagg01

eljagg01 — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:40:21 +0000

Making up silly stories IS fun, isn’t it? ^_^

By: eljagg01

eljagg01 — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:01:06 +0000

Ad hominem.

By: eljagg01

eljagg01 — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:39:31 +0000

China where the government mandates reproduction. Since individual control of it seems so offensive to you. . . if you had a problem with babies being thrown into ponds, dumpsters, etc, you wouldn’t advocate women be forced to have children in the first place. Slavery is forced servitude where people are considered or treated as the property of others. That’s the issue.

By: eljagg01

eljagg01 — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:21:59 +0000

I keep asking for the deductive case against female autonomy upon which any fetal “right to life” depends, but I don’t think it’s coming. . . still, slapping around silly fascists is hella fun!XD

By: bldgy

bldgy — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:36:10 +0000

Then why ignore the actual problem and instead push for abortion? Let’s be honest, if you are advocating abortions rather than advocating changing the status quo of young guys bullying young girls into sex, you are NOT doing it for women’s rights. You are doing it to avoid having to address the actual problem at the expense of young girls.

By: bldgy

bldgy — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:23:08 +0000

1. Perhaps you should go back and actually read my posts? I’ve offered quite a bit of medical information in regards to whether or not the fetus is living, conscious, etc. Funny how pro-choice people always conveniently miss that info. 2. Your post seemed to be an agreement with someone who was arguing against my post, thus that makes it in reference to my posts. That makes it fair game. 3. you’ll note I copied “backwoods” correctly the first time. Ever heard of a typo?

By: bldgy

bldgy — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:23:12 +0000

4. Ad hominem attacks? If you’ll go back and kindly note, such posts from me were responses to ad hominem attacks made on me and pro-lifers in general by others. I merely turned them around on the poster. In fact, I stated more than once that was specifically what I was doing it. If pro-choice people can’t handle ad hominem, then perhaps they shouldn’t engage in ad hominem attacks. Such as was the case in your post which is what I was initially responding to. Are you taking notes?

By: bldgy

bldgy — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:04:00 +0000

The idea that the root social problems that cause various issues we are facing is too hard to fix and therefore should not be addressed is exactly why we are currently having so many social problems today.

By: bldgy

bldgy — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:33:19 +0000

“I don’t believe I implied that”1. I never implied that I coerced females into sex, but you asserted that I do. 2. Your statement was all about allowing abortions to reduce the effects of boys bullying girls into sex without actually addressing the root problem. What is one to take away from such a statement?

By: ASentinel2

ASentinel2 — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:41:51 +0000

Obama doesn’t give a shit about the mother or anyone else. . . He immediately signed into action 9 billion dollars to fund abortions overseas of your tax dollars. . . . Pay up lifers. . . . So this campaign shit is nothing. . . all presidents promise shit in these debates they can’t produce. . .